![]() ![]() Contact tracing revealed the 18 players had interactions with opponents lasting 1 to 364 seconds (median, 12 seconds), with no contacted athletes testing positive over the following 14 days thus, none were considered close contact exposures under the current CDC definition. In all, 138 (11.6%) of the 1190 players tested SARS-CoV-2 positive ( Figure 2), 18 (1.5%) of whom tested positive within 48 hours of playing in a game. Only 13 opponent-pairs had cumulative in-game contact longer than 15 minutes none of the 13 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during 14 days pregame or postgame. Accumulated contact time between 2 players during a single game was fewer than 23 seconds (median length, 10 seconds 37 389 opponent pairs below 97 seconds) in most (29 518 ) instances ( Figure 1). Interactions were fleeting (median length, 6 seconds ), and most (104 274 ) were briefer than 26 seconds. In this cohort study, we analyzed SARS-CoV-2 contact exposures and transmission among opposing team players during college football games as the COVID-19 pandemic surged.īetween September 26 and December 19, 2020, 1190 college football athletes had 109 762 opposing-player interactions over 64 SEC regular season games. 3, 4 In part, traditional contact tracing was augmented using wearable, remote proximity loggers to document interpersonal contacts. When the National Collegiate Athletic Association declared football a high-risk transmission sport, the Southeastern Conference (SEC), an intercollegiate athletic conference of 14 universities in 11 southern US states, responded with protocols aligned with US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance to monitor, manage, and mitigate SARS-CoV-2 exposure. 1, 2 During sporting events, efforts like contact tracing pose unique challenges namely, contact between athletes during play may be brief but recurring, while also challenging to track and triage, especially with interstate competitions. The COVID-19 pandemic created heightened concern over SARS-CoV-2 transmission during athletic competitions and necessitated innovative mitigation solutions for protecting athletes, staff, and attendees. ![]() Shared Decision Making and Communication.Scientific Discovery and the Future of Medicine.Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment.Clinical Implications of Basic Neuroscience.Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |